As for learning that does not lead to a concrete outcome, we often do not know exactly what the outcome will be when we set out to learn new things and acquire new skills. However, if what we are learning takes us in the general direction we want to go, the outcome will likely be good. I find that sometimes I get results that are not what I expected from taking on a new challenge. They might be better than expected or just different.

Is it necessary for a person to value learning to set learning goals? Value learning that does not necessarily lead to a concrete outcome?

Geoff

However, learning goals are about acquiring knowledge and skills that stay with you forever.

Both types of goals are important, and I like the way you use them.

Thanks for your comment!

I heard Keith speak last year too and he got all of us in the audience to set a performance goal and a learning goal. Losts of research shows that learning goals are more effective in improving performance than performance goals.

As for me, I look at the outcomes I want to achieve and then set learning goals such as “I’ll learn 3 strategies that will help me do x.” This really helps me be motivated and open to learning opportunities when they show up.

One of my friends says you shouldn’t set goals like “get x new clients” or “earn x freelance dollars” because that kind of goal depends largely on the actions of others, and that you should stick to goals that are more exclusively within your control. Any thoughts on that?

That’s why I like the idea of “learning goals” and your idea of small milestone goals. Both can take you a long way!

Most weight loss programs suffer from this and that’s why people yo-yo with their weight. When I started losing weight I made my goals 5 pounds each goal, before I knew it I had lost 15 pounds and taught myself a lifelong lesson on proper nutrition along the way.